Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyBrown
...2) I didn't profess anything in this thread, so I don't know what there is to go against, other than my stated agreement with others' characterization of specific Rules. 3) I don't know what you mean by lines of thinking in regards to this thread, but I would hope you would follow only your own. I wouldn't be able to identify a line of thinking of my own in this thread for you to even consider following. I pretty much just asked a bunch of questions.....
|
His only moments of honesty on this forum. He never professes anything in any thread or any discussion, at least not basketball related.
He has no line of thinking and pretty much asks a bunch of dumb-a$$, nonsensical, irrelevant questions.
Notice when we had a great line of discussion surrounding all the plays
APG posted during the post-season tournament that
randall was nowhere to be found. His is totally incapable analyzing real basketball. He has no concept of play-calling. Despite his high IQ he is obviously frustrated that this is one thing he can't wrap his brain around. He is jealous of those of us who have the compentency to officiate real basketball, who have the ability use the words in the rule book in practical application.