Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by marvin
More pitchers are being taught to not deliver a pitch when an illegal pitch is called.
But, that is not what the issue is. The issue is when a pitch is illegal BECAUSE it was not delivered.
|
But, that is not what the issue is. The issue is when a pitch is illegal BECAUSE it was not delivered. |
In the opening post the IP was called almost immediately as the pitcher started. It would be a reasonable for the pitcher to NOT deliver a pitch in that circumstance. Why would that be different than a pitch that is illegal simply because it isn't delivered?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by marvin
The runner's responsibility is to stay on the base until the ball is released, so unless you have an action by the defense that causes an exception to apply (such as the NFHS case cited) then why shouldn't the runner be out?
|
Then you have turned the IP rule on its head. The defense gets a benefit (runner out) by pitching illegally. |
The runner's responsibility does not change - she has to stay on the base until a pitch is released. As I said before if the offense tries to time that release to maximize their jump off the bases they are taking the risk of being called out when anything changes the pitcher's timing.
If the pitcher does not deliver a pitch and,
in the umpire's judgment the pitcher has not violated some other rule, it is the runner's responsibility to comply with the rule that requires them to stay on the base until a pitch is released.