View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 16, 2003, 03:16am
just another ref just another ref is offline
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge


The overall point is that "over the back" is not a foul. You can out jump an opponent from behind and a coach will cry for "over the back."



Agreed, absolutely, but as I said earlier isn't this a very debatable call a large percentage of the time about whether there was enough contact to be a foul? Can't we just read between the lines and know that the coach means: Hey, that guy gave my guy a PUSH in the BACK when
he went OVER him on that rebound. Try this angle.
Coaches also yell: Walk! He walked! That's a walk! etc.
I find no violation which contains the word walk. Why do we not insist that he yell: Hey, 33 illegally moved his pivot foot!


Quote:
So the use of language is very important, because the term is based on a rulebook myth.
Please excuse my ignorance, but what exactly is this myth?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove

Last edited by just another ref; Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 04:07pm.
Reply With Quote