Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyBrown
and I don't think of it in terms of points, but this last part is all I was saying--and you agree with me.
|
No, it wasn't all you were saying. We're saying it's not written that way, but it has to be applied that way. You are disagreeing with the second half of that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyBrown
So far, I haven't come up with a play situation where a particular order changes the outcome, as long as I don't read things into the definition to begin with, and am willing to include other passages in the books.
|
Please answer my most recent question, and we'll see.
Two problems, your theses are simply too long, and you're over thinking the rules. Simply treat them all (IWs, DFs, etc) the same as prescribed in 4-36-1, and go through articles a, b, and c in order.
The rules aren't meant to be complex philosophical problems requiring an advanced degree in rhetoric or mathematics.