Quote:
Originally Posted by tref
You're hearing what you want hear JRut. I said the clear path AZ had raised my antennas for a potential foul. I based my thoughts about the no call on the defenders action.
|
No, you keep interjecting a phrase that is not in the rule or used at that level and has origins only at the NBA level. Again, you feel that this a criteria I am OK with that for you to feel there is an advantage. You do not see me trying to tell you that you are wrong. I am just saying that we should call an intentional foul based on the actions of the foul, not other circumstances that are not stated in the rules or interpretations. And there are no “clear path” criteria in the rule anywhere but the NBA and even in the NBA that criteria is very narrow as stated by another poster.
Peace