View Single Post
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 24, 2011, 05:17pm
LilLeaguer LilLeaguer is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 209
I do not think that word means what you think it means (Part II)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeStrybel View Post
To address the topic, the Fed wants umpires to consider two things when calling a check swing strike - did the batter attempt to strike at the pitch and did the barrel of the bat pass distinct landmarks. It is not a trick question. It was placed on this year's test because it was a point of emphasis to which six columns in the preseason guide addressed.
I do not have a deep knowledge of Fed rules, so I'm basing this on the discussion at hand and my understanding of the meaning of "both".

But here's my problem with the question. I can imagine some circumstances where the barrel of the bat crosses the batter's body that I would not judge a strike. I can't think of any circumstances where the batter struck at the ball that I wouldn't judge, well, a strike. So, A and C are not both equally correct.

Judging purely from the outside, I can see what Fed was trying to do, but this is a horribly worded question. Some folks with thousands of posts on this forum, that I, at least, have some respect for, see the same flaw.
__________________
-LilLeaguer
Reply With Quote