Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
1. It's not the rule book penalty, it's your (and apparently Carl's) interpretation of what "MC supersedes obstruction" means.
|
Mike, what I think is happening is two different approaches to the rule. One would be yours which is the more modern, post 2006 viewpoint. The other would be Strybel's, old, dated and pre-2005.
Quote:
|
2. Fortunately, in Ohio, we now have a more sensible interpretation that has the force of rule.
|
This would be the more philosophical one, would it not?
