Mon Feb 10, 2003, 08:04pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 400
|
|
|
I'm with you JR...
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by John Schaefferkoetter
I like Jeremy's theory.
Elbow below head should be player control or intentional, depending on the situation.
Keep in mind, an offical has a split second to make a decision. Keep it simple, we don't have time to decide if rule R12342134, or rule U[pawiojefok, or if rule aw[eorij should be applied.
|
Uh,John,I believe that if you check back that you will find that Jeremy's theory was that an elbow below the head that made contact was supposed to be called a technical foul.
Other than that,I agree fully with you that everyone one of us should be allowed to make up our own rules. That practically guarantees that we will never have any arguments,because we'll never be wrong-no matter what.I'm all for that.
|
I'm surprised by all of the confusion. Rule is pretty specific and clear.
|