Fri Mar 11, 2011, 04:20pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Childress
=
Rich: I like this play because it neatly proves what I've been saying.
The obstruction is NOT canceled by an offensive penalty. So, the poor defense is goig to get [meat] axed.
The runner score, the batter goes to first, the catcher is ejected. And, as I am wont to say, the umpire will restrict the assistant defensive coach.
|
Carl,
So now you're saying malicious contact does NOT always supersede obstruction? 
JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
|