Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey
Right, but that really wasn't my point.
I believe the author either a) simply forget to mention that little detail, or b) intentionally kept his name out, "because he's a kid." At the risk of turning this thread into something else, we either have bad journalism, or an ethical question where I don't agree with the author's (or editor's) choice.
|
So, assuming the perp is a juvenile, you're ok with publishing his name? I agree with the decision to leave it out.