View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 09, 2003, 01:47am
John Schaefferkoetter John Schaefferkoetter is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 76
I like Jeremy's theory.

Let's keep it simple and clear, elbow to head should be flagrant and outahere. Elbow below head should be player control or intentional, depending on the situation. Elbow missing should be technical foul or violation, depending on the situation.

Keep in mind, an offical has a split second to make a decision. Keep it simple, we don't have time to decide if rule R12342134, or rule U[pawiojefok, or if rule aw[eorij should be applied.
Reply With Quote