I would go intentional foul on this.
I can't see calling it flagrant, but what I see are the arms/hands purposefully extended into the rebounder. If he hadn't extended into the rebounder I could see just a run-of-the-mill personal foul.
As for flagrant, my job is not to read the mind of the fouler, just view the action and rule on what I saw. Makes no difference to me if the player fouled is their star, or their weakest bench-warmer.
__________________
Every time you blow your whistle, 50% of the people LOVE you, and 50% of the people HATE you.
|