|
I've been under two different systems. One is under present officials [partners] rating game performances. This had some inherent errors such as agendas. Since it had a direct correlation on post-season assignments, there was a degree of protectionism. The other has others who are not actively working games do evaluations. This system is better in my opinion than the former or having coaches provide ratings.
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it.
|