Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Gee, all I did was quote you verbatim, Camron. Are you calling yourself a liar?
I'm glad that you're still so adamant also that any official who screws up some rules deserves all the abuse any coach can give him. I'm glad because I'll never have to work with someone like you.
When another official does it, he has a complete lack of rules knowledge and makes stuff up with no basis for anything. But when you do the exact same thing, you're taking an unusual play and extrapolating from existing rulings that were close to the same thing. Hey, who cares if your extrapolations go directly against existing rules? Hell, that don't make no nevermind if you're the one doing it instead of some other official, does it?
Yup, I got it. 
Your very own words show your true colors very nicely imo, Camron.
'Nuff said. |
Are you so insecure or incapable of intelligent debate that you have to resort to mudslinging, personalizing, and taking things completely out of context while avoiding the points of the actual argument? You're basically admitting you're wrong when you do that. Grow up and stick to the point.
You said you can't travel without holding the ball.
Now, show me where the cited case plays are wrong.....the ones that end with a ruling of traveling even though the player, just like the play I was responding to, is not holding the ball at the time of the foot movement. Are you really saying the NFHS is wrong?
If you're capable, show my why. (I'm sure you'll dodge the question again and call me some other names.)