Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey
It looks like that's the crux of our difference. I say team control is relevant, because if team control were lost (i.e. a try for goal), then a travel for recovering the ball would indeed be impossible. However, since team control remained throughout (i.e. the ball travelling through the air, not a shot), then travelling is still possible, IMO.
|
I say you have no rules basis for this distinction. Player control is required to travel, and batting the ball very specifically does not constitute player control.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey
Good question. Assuming he's he holding the ball prior to the fumble, it would depend upon the bats. If he's batting to chase down the ball in any direction, then I'd let it go. If he's clearly intentionally trying to move the ball to a certain spot, then I'd equate that to the ball being thrown in the air and caught by the same player, so I'd have a travel.
I suppose the issue is whether you think a fumble gives a player carte blanche to move the ball as he sees fit. I don't think so.
|
No, the issue is whether you can add stuff to the rules to distinguish between different plays that really, in the end, use the same rules. There is no rule-based distinction between the rebound-bat and the fumble-bat plays.
Again, a controlled bat does not equal player control no matter how much you want it to.