View Single Post
  #82 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 31, 2011, 03:14pm
jearef jearef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee View Post
I think that it's a helluva lot easier if you just consider a bat as being a bat without all the extraneous and uneccessary thinking attached. Where a bat ends up is totally irrelevent, rules-wise. Case book play 4.15COMMENT solves these plays when it states that (a) a player is not dribbling during a bat, and (b) a player is not in control during a bat. That's all the info you need to rule on the plays.

Use the rules we have, not what you wish the rules should be.
Perhaps we have achieved the dreaded "paralysis by (over) analysis"?
Reply With Quote