View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 30, 2011, 01:06pm
jearef jearef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 95
Seems to me that this is another one of those "intent and purpose" situations. If we can accept that the rules intend there are only two ways for a player in control to advance the basketball (dribble it or pass it), then I agree this should be a violation. Problem is, this doesn't fit the definition of a player in control either, since he is neither holding nor dribbling a live ball inbounds.

I'm calling this a violation, and if I'm put to the test, I'm going to cite Rule 2-3.

Very interesting situation.
Reply With Quote