Quote:
Originally Posted by VaTerp
My point is that I could still give a satisfactory answer about my decision, given the context of the entire situation, without knowing exactly what was said.
|
A1 committed a foul, which was ruled intentional, not flagrant, then said something, you have no idea what, then B1 slapped A1 across the face. So you ejected both.
How do you justify this, sir?
And your "satisfactory" answer would be?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.
Lonesome Dove
Last edited by just another ref; Wed Jan 26, 2011 at 10:19pm.
|