Quote:
Originally posted by Int
...the point where you determine that a player starts their try for goal has nothing to do with a defender establishing legal guarding position. If there is a rule or case that does this, please let me know.
[/B]
|
I am trying to understand if there is a relationship between "Habitual motion" and "No time or distance" required.
There are no cases that relate these two rules.
Is the opponent with the ball (4-23) also a shooter? Probably is, eventhough all the cases I find show the opponent with the ball as a dribbler.
I should change my thoughts to be in line with the rest of you guys and not require time, or distance, until the shooter is airborne, and I should just forget the habitual motion thingy with regard to legal guarding postion so that I get on the same page with the rest of the world.
Now ,all I have to worry about is whether the defender had both feet on the floor initially and was facing the opponent.
I can do that.