So I posit that everybody has become confused about who is talking about what.
Let me see if I can resolve this.
Cobra is saying that he can go back and call a foul from the start of the first half if he realizes it was a foul with 5 seconds left in the game. If so all subsequent action happened during a dead ball since the foul made the ball dead. No one agrees with him.
JR is saying that if the ball is erroneously inbounded then it has become live. Only Cobra disagrees on this point.
Camron is saying that if right after the ball is inbounded the V coach says something to merit a technical and he decides to call it that the ball is dead when the coach says it even if he drops his whistle and makes the call a second or two later. The foul made the ball dead and the whistle was just making it official. It's not clear to me if JR agrees or not.
He further envisions that in some early numbered post this is what was happening here. JR disagrees that the early numbered post describes that situation.
JR is saying that if the three is shot and then the official decides to call a technical that the ball was not dead when shot and the three counts. It's not clear to me if Camron agrees or not.
Does this capture everyone's viewpoint or is there more?
________
Vapir no2 vaporizer