Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
1) The word "next" tells me that.
2) Jurassic Referee: Nice post on REF60. How come they didn't delete your post? Does your reputation extend that far in cyberspace?
|
1) There's where we disagree. I read the word "next" as saying you should check to see if it's a valid TO request
next after ensuring player control. If it is a valid TO request, there is no further "next" that I can see saying that you have to check
again to see if player control is still being maintained. You simply grant the legal TO request. I'd ask your rules interpreter to send that one up the line for a further interpretation if I wuz you.
2) No, hopefully they just recognized a valid question. I don't have a clue why they would delete something identical from you. What still bothers me at that site is that the authors of those articles will never come back and answer valid questions. That's just wrong. And that's why I never go there unless someone asks me about something that was posted there.