Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
I don't see how the batmaker can be held responsible. I CAN see how the league and/or organization might be held responsible for not restricting bat specs enough to keep things safe (although I'd be against them on that argument), but legally, what did Easton do that might be considered illegal?
|
Quite often, they just sue everyone involved and let the judge/jury sort out who's responsible.
I agree, if anyone should be responsible, it should be the league/organizing body. And even then, I think that's a stretch.