View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 08, 2010, 12:51pm
bainsey bainsey is offline
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Just because it was with an illegal appendage doesn't make it an intentional foul when it contacts the arm instead of the ball.
That's how I'm leaning. You can always go with "excessive force" if the foot made excessive contact, hence the intentional foul.

Quote:
On an unrelated angle...If the player, with that foot, had contacted the ball instead of the arm, would have you called a kicked ball and killed the shot?
I think you'd have to. If you block the shot with an arm, there's a chance you can recover the ball. If you use the leg, the consequence is that the other team gets the ball automatically.

Last edited by bainsey; Thu Dec 09, 2010 at 08:10am.
Reply With Quote