Quote:
originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci,Sr.
why not see the intentional foul first and consider the common foul as incidental contact
|
We could, but the way the situation was stated...with the common foul listed first, I just saw this play happening the way I stated.
originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci,Sr.
If you decide during your pregame that you are not going to have any simultaneous fouls
No, I don't pregame that we are not going to have any simultaneous fouls...again, this situation doesn't seem to fit the "normal" simultaneous foul situation...thus, my administration "thinking" on this one.
originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci,Sr.
because trying to explain the two fouls to two coaches who are probably not very happy with us is the the easiest thing to do.
Ahhhh, come on MTD...you're not going to change the way you call a game just because of a couple "Howler" coaches, now are ya?
Dude
[Edited by RookieDude on Jan 21st, 2003 at 09:44 PM]