Quote:
Originally Posted by BayStateRef
1. It is an intentional foul. In order to be a flagrant foul, it had to be deemed excessive. It does not sound like that.
|
What has to be deemed excessive? The swing of the elbow? If that's what you mean, then I'm not sure I agree with this. By definition, a flagrant foul includes "severe" contact. You can cause severe contact, even without excessively swinging your elbows.
If you mean that the contact has to be deemed excessive, then I still disagree, because by definition, that would merely be an intentional foul.
Just thought I'd throw that out there, FWIW, which may be nothing.