Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
WTF are you talking about?
Guess we are going to have to walk through this a step at a time.
Are you aware that this is NOT a change to the existing rule?
|
It's a change to part of a very ambiguous rule that we all know how to get right anyway.
Reading from a 2008 rulebook since that's what I have available at the moment.
Rule 1, definitions, Fair Ball
A legally batted ball that:
E. Touches first, second or third base.
8.2.M Double base ...
1. A batted ball hitting or bounding over the white portion is fair.
2. A batted ball hitting or bounding over the colored portion is foul.
Now, we all know that A is meant to trump B. A ball bounding over both is fair and one hitting both is fair. That's the rule, even though it isn't written down anywhere. If you didn't know how to call this and had to figure it out from the book, you'd be hopelessly lost.
Now the new definition which does not fix 8.2.M will read:
Rule 1.Fair.E Touches first (white portion only), second or third base.
which is meant to make the two consistent. Perhaps it isn't meant to solve the obvious problem there. I had assumed it was. But it could incredibly simply. Just by changing the definition of Fair to read:
Rule 1.Fair.E Touches white portion of first base, second base or third base.
If they did that they could even eliminate the part of 8.2.M. that is ambiguous.
________
Wiki Vaporizer