View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 21, 2003, 12:37pm
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,101
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
NCAA Women. In my opinion, the superior set of mechanics and without a doubt the superior mechanics manual.
I've not seen the manual, so I can't comment on it. But there are a few things about the mechanics themselves that I don't really like. I don't like the Lead's coverage area. I think the men's coverage for the Lead is better, although it may a little confusing at first. I don't particularly like the mechanic of going table-side after calling a foul. It's not the worst thing in the world, but I think overall, it's better to stay away from a possibly irate coach. I think that the women "lock down" (no rotating) in the last shot clock cycle of the half. I don't like that. If the L needs to be on the opposite block to call the play, that's where he should be.

On the other hand, I like the "walk and talk" reporting that the pro's use. I think it looks more relaxed, smoother. I like the "punch" for the team control foul, too. But that's about it.

My feeling is that the women's side wants to look like the NBA. I guess there's nothing wrong with that; but NCAA is not NBA. What do you like so much better about the women's mechanics?

Chuck

Chuck,

Here is the third kiss of death I have given you in the last couple of days. I think that you make some very excellent points.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote