Quote:
Originally Posted by reffish
 Right, I agree that the throw-in was contacted illegally, therefore the subsequent throw-in is for the kick and not for the AP throw-in. And I agree my last post was a steaming pile of  |
Fixed it for ya. The kicked throw-in was contacted
illegally. That was my point, and the point of the case play cited also.
And also note the "smiley" that was inserted at the end of the "steaming doo-doo" statement. In no way was that statement meant to be demeaning or derisory towards yourself.