Tue Jan 21, 2003, 01:14am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Mark,
Take a look at 4-19-10+11. In 10 it says that a multiple foul situation does have to be personal fouls, but 11 defines a FALSE multiple foul situation as just two or more fouls. To me that means they can be both personal, both technical, or a mixture of the two.
And Tony, you are right that it doesn't matter for purposes of administering the game, but for an academic rules discussion or a written test it does.
|
I am agreeing with you. Overall this situation is a false double foul. The first two fouls of the situation create a false multiple foul, and the third foul of the situation create a false double foul overall.
|
Sorry for the confusion. I should have specified that I was directing that post to Mark DEXTER, not you MTD. Thanks for your points though. I agree with what you have written.
|