View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 15, 2010, 01:58pm
celebur celebur is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
I think the most defensible positions are A) BR made it to third missing (grossly) 1st and 2nd base, and B) BR is simply "no where" - has not achieved 1st base and that's all.

Once time was called, if you go with A, then BR would be out if appealled, and additionally would be out once the pitcher held the ball, if she tried to go ahead and head toward first base (LBR).
I would agree with this, and I'm not sure which one is the better option.

Since the PU went with A, then:

Quote:
Most of the DC's argument was of the form "She can't do that." and "That's just wrong" --- never any concrete anything.
Given the context, I think I would interpret this as a valid appeal. The DC coach is saying that the BR can't go to 3B without first going to 1B (and 2B) thus implying that she missed those bases.
Reply With Quote