zoochy, in answer to your questions:
Quote:
Q1: Per 9-8-1f:
f. A player’s legitimate effort to legally play the ball, in the judgment of the referee, is affected by a:
1. Non-team member anywhere in a playable area;
Per 2-5:
SECTION 5 NON-TEAM MEMBERS
Non-team members include but are not limited to all authorized officials, media personnel (including equipment) and spectators located in playable areas.
So, yes, the replay was the correct call.
|
Quote:
Q2: Yes. Per 11-3-1 & 2:
SECTION 3 REVIEWING DECISIONS
ART. 1 . . . To review a decision by a referee that may have resulted in an incorrect decision, the head coach may request and be granted a time-out, provided the request is made during the dead ball immediately following the situation in which the possible incorrect decision occurred. When a time-out is so granted, the head coach shall confer with the first referee at the first referee’s platform. If the conference results in the first referee altering the ruling, the opposing coach shall be notified by the second referee, the revision made and the time-out charged to the referee.
ART. 2 . . . Decisions based on the judgment of the referee(s) are final and not subject to review.
PENALTY: If the referee’s decision prevails, the team requesting the conference shall be charged a time-out. If the team has already used its allotted time-outs, a loss of rally/point shall be awarded to the opponent.
|
The simplest response to the coach is, "Coach, in my judgment the R2 interfered with a legitimate effort to play the ball. It is my judgment that a replay is warranted. Since it is a judgment call, no review is allowed. Your team is assessed a Time-out since the call is not going to change. Let's play. Thank you."