Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
No, it doesn't. There are NO fouls for which Team B must do something to prove Team A fouled. Either they did or they didn't - Team B's degree of "jumpiness" and/or their steadfastness in not moving until the ball is snapped is completely irrelevant as to whether it's a foul or not. Further - what you are suggesting would mean that 2 completely identical movements by the RB would be a foul once, and not a foul later.
|
Yes, that's exactly what I'm suggesting. And I think there are other factors besides team B's rxn which could determine whether the
same action by A1 simulates action at the snap in one case and not another.