Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
In the case of the NFHS "blarge" call, you will always charge one foul incorrectly, so there's a 100% incorrect rate.
|
So you think a 200% error rate 50% of the time is better??
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
I understand it appeases coaches and players to some extent, but where I disagree with the ruling is you're charging one player and team with a foul that didn't commit a foul, simply because the officials didn't do their job correctly. If offiicals follow the correct mechaincs, this should never happen.
|
Following the correct mechanics only avoids displaying the discrepancy. It doesn't ensure the call is correct when two officials have differing opinions on a play but they held thier whistle and/or signal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
But when it does, their hands are tied when it comes to how it can be fixed - one team definitely gets screwed, rather than the chance of getting the call right.
|
or the chance of getting it doubly wrong.