Thread: Choice of spot.
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 19, 2003, 10:30pm
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,048
original post: "The home team just shot and made the last of two FT. There was a sub at the table, so obviously we stopped the game to bring in the sub after the made FT. But immediately after we brought the sub in, the visting team coach wanted us to bring the ball in on the opposite side of the lane than I was standing. I was the New Trail and was going to administer the throw-in and told the thrower that he could run the baseline in this situation."

There is only one correct way to administer this throw-in and that is for the "new" Trail to remain table side. There is no reason for the "new" Trail to go opposite the table for this throw-in. This also applies for the throw-in if a timeout had been request and granted before the this throw-in. The "new" Trail remains table side to administer the throw-in.

The "new" Trail will remain administer the throw-in from the table side in both scenarios whether the officiating crew is either a two-person or three-person and whether you are using NFHS or CCA/NCAA mechanics.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote