Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN
Because the rule (9-4-3k) says absolutely nothing about the direction the runner is pulled, only where the hand may not go. Those that say the runner must be pulled down backwards are adding their own interpretation. If the hand is in the back or side and the player is pulled to the ground by that action, it's a horsecollar foul.
The player being pulled down to the side is specifically mentioned in 9.4.3 Situation L, play (b) as a foul.
The only case play that addresses a player going forward is a play where the player *falls* forward. If he's pulled forward (which can certainly happen if the hand is in the side of the jersey), there's nothing that absolves the defender and of the crew for calling the foul.
|
Here is the
Case Book-*9.4.3 SITUATION L:
A1 is running in the open field and B1 grabs A1's shoulder pad opening from behind and:
(a) pulls A1 down abruptly backwards;
(b) pulls A1 down to the ground from the side;
(c) rides A1 for several yards before pulling A1 backwards to the ground;
or (d) rides A1 for several yards before A1 falls forward.
RULING: Illegal horse-collar foul in (a), (b) and (c),
legal in (d)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN
Like I said before, many officials are simply looking for excuses to *not* call the foul when it's right in front of them with the defender's hand in the cookie jar.
|
I agree, but that does not mean the coach was "accurate" about what he was told or did not misinterpret the conversation.
Peace