View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 19, 2010, 01:06pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie View Post
This is a rules conflict since there is the clear statement of "no penalty" shall be enforced more than half the distance and the exception isn't given here as it is for, say, DPI.
That is semantics, if there is a rule that allows for a specific penalty to be enforced a certain way, why does it matter what one aspect of the rule says or does not say? I do not see that as a conflict at all. At least not one that matters. What is the intent of that wording? That is all that should matter.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote