|
DrMoore - mb responded to two other people's comments on this thread, and then you attacked him - essentially in my book after he had just agreed with you. In this attack you ask him 3 other scenarios and then deride him. I completely don't blame him for ignoring you.
Then after another reply of his, you sarcastically refer to his intelligence and knowledge, implying he has none in your opinion.
All this after he basically said the only way to fix LJ's error is to make up rules (which is what you did). For the record, I likely would have done what you did.
Snarkiness = unnecessary antagonism. Not understanding your continual and completely uncalled for antagonism.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”
West Houston Mike
|