Quote:
Originally posted by oppool
"Sit#2 BUT under some circumstances I believing not moving maybe ruled intentional. This would be a judgement call by the ump."
That would fly in the face of all the official rulings I've seen on interference by a batter. In fact, it would be a direct contradiction of several.
For all of you who have disagreed with this statement
NFSH Rule 7-3 art 5 "By failing to make a reasonable effort to vacate congested area when there is a throw at home and there is time for the batter to move away"
ASA POE 31 B. "The batter's box is not a sactuary for the batter when a play is being made at the plate"
I believe both of these rules cover a batter not moving in the batters box being called for interference.
JMO
Don
[Edited by oppool on Jan 17th, 2003 at 02:03 PM]
|
Both of the rules cited apply to a batter when a play is being made
at the plate. The recent discussion is regarding the batter when a throw is being made by a catcher to
another base. I don't think the citings above would apply