Quote:
Originally Posted by john_faz
In this case, R has the ability to stop the ball from advancing further to his goal line. K then does not get the advantage of having the grounded scrimmage kick gain further yards. I understand there is no penalty on R but it seems like they have an advantage in a small way. Especially, since K can not tackle R because the ball is dead.
|
That is where we get in trouble, we start putting advantage or a disadvantage in an action that is not illegal. K kicked the ball so they have the advantage of being able to field the ball if the ball is grounded. Why would you care what R can and cannot do? They are getting the ball. That is advantage enough.
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_faz
It seems to me that K is at a disadvantage. If R signals for a fair catch and then does not catch it on the fly, are we to assume that all K players must know a fair catch signal was given? even though the ball was not caught in flight.
|
How else does K know there is a fair catch signal given in the first place? They obviously have to see the signal before the catch is made right? And by giving a FC signal, that R player cannot block. So R is making a sacrifice to make such a signal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_faz
What happens if K tackles the R player right after possession is gained, would you consider it a personal foul - late hit or would you grant K some leeway?
|
It depends on if a catch is immediate or if the player is having trouble gaining possession of the ball. No hard, fast answer, just know that the ball is dead once R gains possession. But that does not mean K gets a free shot. The reason you signal the FC is to get protection. The player not giving a signal does not have protection to completely catch the ball without an expectation of being contacted. This is one of those HTBT situations we often talk about here.
Peace