[PeteBooth]

I do not mean to keep "stealing thunder" from other Boards, but this topic got plenty of play, so to keep the discussions going here goes.


Unlike football, there are not many situations in a baseball game where a coach has an option. One of those situations concerns catchers interference (or obstruction if you are working FED games).

Sitch: r3 1 out.
B1 grounds to F6 but B1 was interfered with by F2. F6 throws to F3 to get B1 and r3 scores.

Ok playing action over and since all runners have not advanced at least 1 base, we have some work to do. Also, a coach now has some options coming his way.

As PU do you?

A. Enforce catchers interference by sending r3 back to third
and putting B1 at first. At this point do you keep quiet and wait for the coach to actually say Hey Blue I want the play to stand - score the run. Will you instruct the coach in any manner?

If one uses this approach, basically you have r3 scoring, then you put him back at third and then score the run again upon the coaches actions.

IMO, this seems cumbersome; score it, no don't score it ok score it.

or do you?

B. After playing action has ended, call over both coaches and explain to them the situation. We have catchers interference. Do you say to the offensive coach - Coach do you want the play or the interference?

This is meaningful. If the offensive team is tied or trailing by a run, chances are they will take the merits of the play, however, if they are trailing by more than a run chances are they want to preserve those precious outs and take the penalty.


In Summary concerning Catchers interference (obstruction), what's your style? For those veteran umpires who want to respond - what is taught at the schools? I have been taught both.

Thanks guys

Pete Booth