Quote:
Originally Posted by MigoP
I'm not trying to be insulting but opinions not backed up by rule are open to interpretations. Why wouldn't you cite rules to back your case. We should just take peoples opinions as fact when we have a rule book.
What 2 things are different? Rules please.
|
You may not be trying, but you're succeeding. Just stop saying "read the rules". I wasn't asking you not to post rules... just to stop telling people to read them. That's insulting.
That said - you are using rules from 2 different sections of the book - both of which apply in completely different situations than the OP, and insisting that while EVERYONE but you acknowledges that the OP is not specifically defined in the rule book (or case plays), YOU somehow know for fact that it is. There are people on this board who are in the room when rules are written and discussed. They have both authority and integrity when they post. You don't, especially when you continue to post irrelevant rules, insult people, and then talk baseball.