Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
Ugh - not liking 8-16-8. If you take out the word 'intentionally', then a runner 3 steps from 2nd who is retired via force, and subsequently hit by the throw that he couldn't avoid is now guilty of interference. Hoping there's some clarifications there.
|
Rubbish. Don't see this as any different than ASA's take on the rule
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|