Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
To make myself clear: there was nothing in the initial coach's comment that required an aggressive handling technique by the official.
|
And to make myself clear, that is up to the calling official. The calling official decides what is the best thing to do at that point of time in a game. Billy, the calling official, decided that a warning was his best option. I refuse to second-guess Billy for choosing to do so, as I also wouldn't second-guess you for choosing to ignore the comment under the same circumstances. The course of action depends on each individual official's level of tolerance.
What bothers me though is the people that think a coach should get be able to get away with a personal, derogatory remark at an official
AFTER they have been warned. If they're not going to follow up on a warning, whatinthehell is the use of giving out that warning in the first place?