|
In discussing this particular case play, about all we are doing is speculating about what was/could have been in the heads of those who wrote it. We have little choice in the matter but to call the violation, which was formerly one thing and now is another.
At least there is no direct contradiction, (is there?) like in the hideous backcourt interpretation.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.
Lonesome Dove
|