Thread: Sunlight
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 11, 2010, 02:04am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp View Post
If it's RIGHT at that line, I can't call it foul without seeing it.
Why not? Can you afford to be wrong and give up a double, or let a potential run score because you can't see schitt?

My thought on this is... why NOT call it foul? Kill it and bring the batter back with a strike.

Assuming it's fair and you call it foul: Sure, it MIGHT be a huge reward to the defense if you call it foul, but the offense is hurt very little with a strike on the batter.

Assume it's foul and you signal fair: you just F'd the defense, and gave a huge reward to the offense.

I don't know. I hear what you're saying... you can't call a foul if you don't see it. But can you keep it fair if you don't see it, either?
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote