Quote:
Originally Posted by shipwreck
........ As a side note that doesn't affect the ruling, the sub was listed on the line underneath the #7 batter. She must have thought she was to come in after #7 batter got on base. The PU didn't catch it at the pregame meeting which may have helped.
Dave
|
I'm having a hard time imagining this. How was the lineup card arranged such that the sub was listed under the #7 batter? From the cards I'm familiar with I would have thought she was the #8 batter instead of the sub. Or, if she was listed as a sub I would have questioned why she appeared to be listed in the middle of the batting order. Either way I would have made sure it was clear before concluding the plate conference. But this must be different than it seems and I just don't understand.