Quote:
Originally Posted by tref
1) Really? We have a difference of opinion & you resort to name calling? That’s say a lot about you Mr. Assignor.
2) Out with the old in with the new, but dont worry about it, you'll catch on in about 3-5 years. Then we'll be practicing some other new philosophies that you'll despise 
3) Our job is to judge whether that contact AFTER the release affected the shot. |
1) I can't find one instance for where I called
you a name. Your
ideas about officiating are about the dumbest that I have ever read though. Note that relates to your
opinions, not you personally.
2) And you still don't get it. And you never will get it. And I won't bother repeating myself again after saying for the last time that you haven't said one damn thing that is new in any way. Everything you said is just a re-packaged version of some very old and still valid officiating principles. And unfortunately, you don't even seem to understand the re-packaged version correctly either.
3) And that tells me all that I really need to know about you as an official. The only way that contact after the release of a shot can affect that shot is if the contact is on the ball, not on the shooter. Put that together with your statement
"I explained that the contact enough for an and 1 was just enough to put the player on the line for 2 on the missed try'" and you got two statements made by you in this thread that tie for the stoopidest statements ever made on this forum.
Onwards and upwards to your Brave New World of officiating, tref. Hopefully, when you do build up some spit in your whistle, you might understand what we're talking about.