View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 23, 2010, 08:52am
TwoBits TwoBits is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
I absolutely do not agree. Nor do I think that this is umpire interference. And I also disagree that there is no rule to cover the case: there is, namely the dropped third strike rule.
Here is the FED book's wording for the part that applies to the OP:

2-21-2: It is umpire interference when he inadvertently moves so as to hinder a catcher's attempt to throw...

No mention that this applies only to throwbacks to the pitcher or only throws to a base. As a matter of fact, the wording makes it seem as it this rule could apply on a fair batted ball that the catcher fields (although I don't see how an umpire could possibly interfere with that play).

That batter in the OP has got to go somewhere, whether it be the dugout or first base. Where would you place him, Mbyron?
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote