|
Somebody in this thread said it was a rewrite.
My old LLGB has the old wording which usually matches OBR and it is different. I don't have any older OBR books to compare.
So, I believe it is a rewrite and not one of the errors we all know about in the rules.
It might be a new error but you haven't given me any proof of that. I believe a lot of what is posted here. If you can give me a cite or the previous discussion of this particular error I would appreciate it. I am aware of the errors that exist in OBR.
|