Quote:
Originally Posted by vcblue
So re-read the rule book and don't see anywhere where I am SPECIFICALLY told to make that decision right then. Please call out the ASA rule or RS.  |
Which is why we have clinics. It doesn't need to be made immediately, but it must be in a very quick manner, because...
If you do not determine the base which the runner would have reach safely had the OBS not occurred, how are you going to know to where you are protecting that runner?
As noted in the RS, how will you know when the player has run out of protection and is available to be put out if you don't know which base that is?
Quote:
|
My biggest beef with obstruction is Umpires (in my father's words: Ticky-Tacky) don't let the play develop. They see obstruction make a decision. Then things happen that should change their decision and they don't. Or, they just call it to fast. OBS should be seen as "about-to-receive", but called as "ball-in-hand"
|
No, subsequent action should not be considered in the award. Yes, this is from multiple clinics each involving NUS member making the statement.
BTW, I'm a firm believer an umpire should observe a team, learn their strengths, weaknesses and tendencies and use this data in making judgments such as that with OBS.